Talk:Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation

From Censorpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This article is missing a considerable amount of information --Jackie Sider 11:50, 3 February 2012 (PST)


There has been a recent Supreme Court decision relating to the lack of clear definition of indecency on the airwaves at the FCC, especially with the proliferation of cable and on-demand channels where no such restrictions exist. Consequently, there is speculation that the Pacifica "Carlin" decision should be revisited and thrown out altogether.